Workshop on ‘Intellectual Virtues, Group Knowledge and Education’, University of Edinburgh, 15 May 2014
Eidyn’s new pilot Projects ‘Epistemology of Education‘ and ‘Group Knowledge‘ are hosting a joint workshop on ‘Intellectual Virtues, Group Knowledge and Education’.
Date: 15 May 2014. Venue: Edinburgh Informatics Forum, 4.31/ 4.33.
Mainstream epistemology has recently turned its focus on the concept of intellectual virtues. In this one-day workshop we will explore, both from a philosophical and a cognitive science perspective, how intellectual virtues are related to individual knowers, how they can facilitate group dynamics in epistemic contexts, and how thinking about knowledge in terms of intellectual virtues, both at the individual and group level, can shape the future of education.
Everyone is welcome and the event is free, but ticketed. Click here to book a place.
09:30-09:45 Welcome and Registration
09:45-10:45 Introductory Remarks
09:45-10:15 Orestis Palermos (Edinburgh): The ‘Group Knowledge Project’
10:15-10:45 Adam Carter (Edinburgh): ‘The Epistemology of Education Project’
10:45-12:00 Ben Kotzee (Birmingham): ’Disciplinary Knowledge and 21st Century Skills (or: Why You Can’t Just Google It)’
In contemporary educational thought, disciplinary knowledge is (just) emerging from a long losing streak. Progressive educational thinkers (inspired by, for instance Rousseau and Dewey) have long attacked the organisation and transmission of knowledge in the form of the traditional subject discipline, preferring, instead, an organisation dependent on the student’s needs or interests. Furthermore, political criticism of the discipline since the 1960?s has focussed on how the traditional subject disciplines entrench the perspectives of the privileged and should be replaced, instead, by themes, projects, experienced-based learning or other student – and/or ability-centred approaches. More recently, anti-disciplinary approaches to the curriculum have been organised under the slogan that schools should not teach facts, but ’21st Century Skills’ (such as problem-solving, critical thinking and creativity). Advocates of 21st Century Skills hold that, since they are now armed with Google, children need not learn facts. In this paper, I sketch the importance of the skills versus knowledge debate in education to epistemology. I trace work in the philosophy of education on this issue to debates regarding Ryle’s distinction between knowing that and knowing how. Specifically, I discuss Ryle’s thoughts about learning to make an academic argument as a form of doing (the so-called Lewis Carroll-problem (Stanley, 2011)). I consider intellectualist and anti-intellectualist analyses of what it is to know how to ‘do’ a discipline and outline the consequences for the skills/knowledge debate as it touches the disciplines. I outline an account of the value of disciplinary knowledge that takes knowledge to be an indispensable part of proficiency in a discipline but that resists seeing knowledge of how to do disciplinary study as itself no more than extensive knowledge that. In closing I outline what a virtue epistemological account of academic knowledge has to offer over an account focussed on critical thinking skill and sketch out the prospects for further philosophical work.
12:00-13:00: Lani Watson (Edinburgh): ‘Why Should Philosophers Study Questioning?’
The practice of questioning is a ubiquitous part of our everyday lives. It plays a central role in our interactions with the world around us and our communication with the people in it. As such it provides a rich topic for philosophical investigation. Despite its widespread and familiar applications however, the practice of questioning has not been the subject of extensive analysis in the Western philosophical tradition. In this paper I argue that philosophers should pay greater attention to both analysing and evaluating the practice of questioning. This is particularly pertinent within an applied philosophical context given the valuable role that questioning plays in a wide variety of practical and everyday settings. I focus in particular on the epistemological significance of questioning arguing that it plays a central role in the acquisition of epistemic goods such as knowledge and understanding. With this in mind, a significant area of applied philosophical interest in which an examination and evaluation of questioning has beneficial applications is education. Furthermore, when examined as a practice questioning can be viewed as an indispensable form of social cohesion As such the practice of questioning emerges as a topic of wide-ranging philosophical import and one worthy of rigorous analysis and evaluation within an applied philosophical context.
14:00-15:00 Paul Anderson (Edinburgh): ’Orchestrating the Student Experience with Social Media Tools’
I will describe some work that we did as part of a Principal’s Teaching Award to look at the different ways in which social media and other tools are used across the University to support specific types of pedagogical interaction. I will summarise the findings from our interviews, speculate on whether it is useful to think about the applications in terms of their interaction models, and mention some of the significant emerging themes.
15:00-16:15: Richard Menary (Macquarie): TBA
Towards a Framework for Joint Action is a full-day workshop held in conjunction with the 23rd IEEE International Symposium on Robot And Human Interactive Communication (IEEE RO-MAN 2014) in Edinburgh on August 25, 2014. The workshop will bring together researchers from robotics, psychology and philosophy to discuss frameworks for thinking about and designing for human-robot joint action.
We invite submission of short papers (maximum four pages), including position papers from philosophers. The submission deadline is May 2, 2014.
For more information, see http://fja2014.sciencesconf.org/.
- Rachid Alami – CNRS senior researcher at Laboratoire d’Analyse et d’Architecture des Systèmes LAAS-CNRS, Toulouse, France
- Jeffrey Bradshaw – Senior Research Scientist at the Florida Institute for Human and Machine Cognition (IHMC)
- Elisabeth Pacherie – CNRS senior researcher in Philosophy at Institut Jean Nicod (UMR 8129, ENS, EHESS, CNRS), affiliated with the Institue for the Study of Cognition at Ecole Normale Supérieure, Paris
- Julie Shah – Assistant Professor in the Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, lead the Interactive Robotics Group in CSAIL
- Cordula Vesper – Social Mind and Body group (SOMBY), Department of Cognitive Science, Central European University, Budapest, Hungary
The Jagiellonian-Rutgers Conference in Cognitive Science
Grzegorz J. Nalepa
During the Jagiellonian-Rutgers Conference in Cognitive Science we shall focus on the current state of research on cognition and action, looking more deeply into the links between the two. Main topics include, but are not restricted to, varieties of cognition and action, perception and coordination, planning and execution, impact of emotions on performance, decision making, language and performance, cognitive dimensions of moral actions, models for spatial navigation and motor control, and cognitive integration.
Aiming to provide a forum where to discuss new concepts and innovative approaches in all branches of cognitive science research, we encourage submissions of both basic and applied work.
For submission and registration guidelines as well as other information about the conference, please visit cognitivescience.eu.
Looking forward to seeing you in Kraków in June 2014,
Sebastian T. Kolodziejczyk & the Organising Committee
The EIDYN Centre for Epistemology, Mind and Normativity recently launched one more pilot project on the topic of Group Knowledge.
How do groups store, share, and generate knowledge? Moreover, can groups be intelligent agents in themselves, under which conditions, and what effects may this have on the previous set of questions? Interdisciplinary research on such philosophically motivated considerations can lead to a number of key economic, social and cultural benefits.
Group Knowledge is an EIDYN pilot project that builds on the strengths of the University of Edinburgh in the humanities and social sciences, epistemology and philosophy of mind and cognitive science. The aspiration is to bring together experts from such diverse fields as philosophy, computer science, economics, group dynamics, and public policy (amongst others) under a major research programme whose aim will be to study, design and explore the potential theoretical and technological impact of group knowledge and its underlying processes.
To read more click here.
Department of History and Philosophy of Science and Selwyn College
Vacancy reference: JN02015
Salary: £37,756 to £47,787 pa
Applications are invited for a permanent University Lectureship in the Philosophy of Psychology and Cognitive Science, to start on 1 September 2014 or as soon as possible thereafter. This post is part of the Trinity Scheme for Joint Lectureships and will be held in the Department of History and Philosophy of Science (HPS) in conjunction with a Fellowship at Selwyn College.
Responsibilities will include contributing to all aspects of undergraduate and graduate teaching, supervising and examining, leading research in the philosophy of psychology or cognitive science, and various administrative duties for the Department and the College.
Applicants must hold a PhD (or equivalent) and have an outstanding record of excellence in teaching, research and publication in this area. The Department offers an exceptionally stimulating and supportive interdisciplinary research environment and the opportunity to develop undergraduate and graduate teaching in the post-holder’s areas of expertise.
- Closing date: 5pm on Friday 7 March 2014
- Longlisting: by approx 17 March 2014
- Shortlisting: by approx 25 March 2014
- Job talks and informal meetings: all day on 23 April 2014
- Interviews: morning of 24 April 2014 (videoconferencing will be available if required)
More information is here: http://www.hps.cam.ac.uk/jobs/jn02015.html
Wednesday 26 March 2014
The 9th Mind Network workshop will take place in the Faculty of Philosophy, University of Oxford.
The speakers are:
Richard Holton (Cambridge): Actions and Thick Intentional Verbs
Craig French (Cambridge): Vision and Knowledge
Ellen Fridland (KCL): They’ve lost control: Reflections on Skill
A full programme for the meeting, and information on how to register, is here: http://cl.ly/TODi
The local organisers are:
The Deductive and Mathematical Cognition Philosophy Conference will be held at the University of Bristol on 7th and 8th April 2014. The conference aims to investigate the implications of recent empirical developments in the study of deductive and mathematical cognition for established questions in the philosophy of mathematics and logic. We hope to provide an environment for interdisciplinary discourse between philosophers and those working within the relevant empirical disciplines. The conference will spend one day focussing on each field, the first day (April 7th) on Mathematical Cognition and Philosophy of Mathematics and the second (April 8th) on Deductive Cognition and Philosophy of Logic.
Caterina Dutilh Novaes (Groningen)
Helen De Cruz (Oxford)
Bart van Kerkhove (Brussels)
The call for papers is open to any from a diverse range of fields, including but not limited to philosophy, logic, mathematics, psychology, cognitive science, history and anthropology. At least two spaces are reserved for early career academics and graduate student submissions.
For the first day we welcome submissions that focus on the implications of recent findings in the study of mathematical cognition for traditional issues in the philosophy of mathematics. Suggested topics include but are by no means limited to:
- Presentations of experimental work that is of interest to philosophers of mathematics.
- Do recent findings about the nature of mathematical cognition support certain positions in the ontology of mathematics?
- Do these findings support Structuralism?
- Do these findings support Fictionalism?
- To what extent are mathematical entities mind-independent?
- What can recent findings in the study of mathematical cognition tell us about the nature of mathematical knowledge?
- Is mathematical knowledge a priori / a posteriori?
- How do we acquire arithmetical knowledge?
- o How do we acquire geometrical knowledge?
- What role does the historical development of mathematical notation play in determining the nature of mathematical knowledge?
For the second day of the conference, we are looking for papers on a wide range of topics introducing empirical sources of information and insight to philosophical questions concerning logic. Such questions may be metaphysical, epistemological or methodological.Topics include but are by no means limited to:
- Presentations of empirical work into the nature of deductive processes.
- Implications of empirical work for issues in the epistemology of logic
- Is logic innate?
- Can we acquire knowledge of logical principles through introspection?
- Implications of empirical work for the foundations of logic
- What is the subject of logic?
- Are we deductively rational? If not what are the implications for the prescriptive role of logic as a guide to correct reasoning?
- Should we construct and assess our logics using data from the study of deductive reasoning processes?
Papers should be submitted via Easychair by 15th February 2014 in the following format.
1) A cover letter including the author’s name, university affiliation, contact information, title of paper, topic area, word count, and an abstract of no more than 250 words.
2) A paper prepared for blind review. Submissions should not exceed 4,000 words and should be suitable for a 40-minute presentation.
The registration for delegates that are not presenting a paper is £20, with a reduced fee of £10 for students.
The conference is supported by The British Society for the Philosophy of Science
iCog is a new network for postgraduate and early-career researchers working in the different disciplines of cognitive science: anthropology, computational intelligence, linguistics, neuroscience, philosophy and psychology. The iCog network aims to equip junior researchers with the knowledge base, skills and professional networks to ensure that progress in cognitive science continues to be made through interdisciplinary work. These aims will be achieved through conferences, training workshops and through its own international database of researchers, iCogS.
Visit i-cog.com for more details.
The iCog network has just launched iCogS to help postgraduates and early-career researchers working in the different disciplines of cognitive science get in touch with each other, exchange knowledge, and initiate collaborations. Researchers can create a profile detailing their research interests, current research and whether they are interested in collaborating with other researchers, which disciplines they are interested in collaborating with, the topic or question they wish to investigate collaboratively, and the methodologies they wish to employ (if known). Even for those not currently seeking collaborators, having an iCogS profile is a good way to advertise your research to other researchers in the cognitive science community.
Visit i-cog.com/icogs to create your profile and search the iCogS database for other researchers.
The iCog network acknowledges the generous support of the Mind Association, Aristotelian Society, Analysis Trust, Guarantors of Brain, Language and Cognition (Cambridge University Press), and the Departments of Philosophy and Psychology, Faculty of Science, and the Hang Seng Centre for Cognitive Studies at the University of Sheffield.
4th April 2014, Goldsmiths, London, UK
Submissions are invited for a one day symposium taking place as part of the 2014 convention of the Society for the Study of Artificial Intelligence and the Simulation of Behaviour (the AISB).
Submission deadline: 7th January 2014
Xabier Barandiaran (University of the Basque Country)
Daniel Hutto (University of Wollongong / University of Hertfordshire)
J. Kevin O’Regan and Jan Degenaar (Université Paris Descartes)
Michael Wheeler (University of Stirling)
In its best established guise, enactivism is an approach to cognition that challenges mainstream cognitive science by rejecting internal representation and ascribing a central role, instead, to the biological autonomy of cognitive agents and their ability to “make sense” of the world. The approach originates with Varela, Thompson and Rosch’s (1991) book The Embodied Mind and has roots in earlier work on autopoiesis and phenomenology. From these origins, the canonical position has been developed and enriched in different ways by Varela, Di Paolo, Thompson and others. All assign an important role to the notion of autopoiesis.
In recent years, the ‘enactivism’ label has, more liberally, been applied to accounts that ignore or downplay autopoiesis but share the original theory’s emphasis, in place of internal representation, on environmentally-situated bodily coupling. One such theory is the enactive or sensorimotor account of perception, given perhaps its canonical statement by O’Regan and Noë (2001), and building on important work by Hurley (1998). More recent still is the ‘radical enactivism’ of Hutto and Myin (2013), which has just been given its first book-length statement.
About the symposium
“Varieties of enactivism: A conceptual geography” will chart this conceptual terrain. The symposium aims to clarify the key conceptual boundaries that hold both between different kinds of enactivism, and between enactivism and neighbouring accounts in embodied cognitive science. In the process, it aims to find out whether ‘enactivism’, as the term is used, denotes no more than a motley, or whether, alternatively, there is some minimal framework that might unify enactivist accounts while usefully distinguishing them from neighbouring approaches.
Up-to-date information is available from the symposium web page here at http://varietiesofenactivism.wordpress.com/
We are looking for high quality submissions that closely reflect the stated aim of the symposium. The intended outcome is to publish the conference proceedings as a special issue, which will serve as a unique and valuable resource for anyone seeking greater clarity given the recent upspringing of diverse accounts bearing the enactivist name.
Talks will be 30 minutes long, but to facilitate eventual publication, submissions should take the form of papers of 6,000 – 8,000 words.
Papers should be formatted using the Word or LaTeX templates available at: http://www.aisb.org.uk/convention/aisb08/download.html
They should be submitted for review via EasyChair at the following URL: https://www.easychair.org/conferences/?conf=voe14
DEADLINE: 7th January 2014
We aim to notify you of the outcome by 7th February 2014
Please direct any questions about the symposium or your submission to the organising committee:
David Silverman (University of Stirling)
Mario Villalobos (University of Edinburgh)
Dave Ward (University of Edinburgh)
Email addresses appear on the symposium web page.
The organisers gratefully acknowledge the support of the Mind Association in making this symposium possible
AISB-50, a convention commemorating both 50 years since the founding of the society for the study of Artificial Intelligence and the Simulation of Behaviour (the AISB) and sixty years since the death of Alan Turing, founding father of both Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence, will be held at Goldsmiths, University of London, UK from the 1st to the 4th April 2014.
Deadline: 7th February 2014.
Dates: 24th-25th April 2014.
Location: Granada (Spain).
Invited speakers: David Ward (University of Edinburgh). One more invited speaker will be confirmed soon.
The Research Workshop on Philosophy of Biology and Cognitive Science (PBCS) aims at promoting interaction among philosophers, cognitive scientists and biologists on issues of common interest. In its fourth edition, the organizers would like to encourage young researchers to participate in this fresh and distinctive forum through this call for papers.
This call is addressed to graduate, master, and Ph.D. students working on the areas of Philosophy of Biology and of Cognitive Science. Doctors who finished their thesis during the last three years will also be considered.
Submissions: Applicants must send a detailed summary of the talk (about 2000 words) in doc or PDF. Summaries are expected to indicate the title of the talk and also highlight the relevance of the topic for the event and a sketch of the main arguments. They can be written in English or Spanish. Applicants must send two copies of the summary: one will contain the name(s) of the author(s), affiliation(s) and email contact. The second one will not include names, affiliations, email contact or any kind of information that could reveal the authorship of the document. Submissions should be sent to email@example.com. Applicants will receive an answer by 7th March 2014.
Talks: Each talk will last no more than 30-40 minutes followed by a 10-15 minutes discussion.
Scientific committee: Paco Calvo (UM), Antonio Diéguez (UMA), Xavier de Donato (USC),Toni Gomila (UIB) Alfredo Marcos (UVA), Fernando Martínez Manrique (UGR), Álvaro Moreno (UPV), Matteo Mossío (CNRS), Manuel de Pinedo (UGR), Agustín Vicente (UPV), Neftalí Villanueva (UIB) & Hong Yu Wong (Universität Tübingen).
Organizing committee: Cristian Saborido (UNED) & Víctor M. Verdejo (USC)
Local organizing committee: Manuel Heras Escribano (UGR) & Manuel de Pinedo (UGR).
Supported by: Departamento de Filosofía I, Universidad de Granada & Research project “Dispositions, Holism and Agency” (MEC, FFI2010-19455)
Under the auspices of AIFBI (Asociación Iberoamericana de Filosofía de la Biología).
More information will be available soon at http://ivresearchworkshop.wordpress.com.